Joern Rennecke wrote:
Eric Botcazou wrote:The machines I use have the 'security enhancement' enabled which makes addresses vary between program invocations. So if code generation depends on pointer values at anyNot sure what's going on exactly...point, this will cause varying behaviour.
Hmm, I've tried re-building cfg.o by hand, and stage1 produces consistently a smaller cfg.o than stage2.
So this doesn't seem to be related to random pointers. Are you using --with-arch=i686 ?
