Andrew Haley wrote: > Roberto COSTA writes: > > > > By the way, from the previous messages, I understand that the > > inclusion of a CIL back-end into gcc cannot be taken as granted > > until the issue is discussed and an approval is obtained. > > Right. And I wouldn't hold my breath waiting. > > > In the meantime, I hope this doesn't prevent requesting a development > > branch. Without that, it would be much more difficult to build a > > collaborative, open and world-wide visible development environment. > > This is a sensitive matter. Whether or not this can be done even on a > development branch is a matter for the SC.
Well, we've generally allowed development branches for anyone who has write access to the repository and a copyright assignment (which is a prereq for write access anyway). Is this not our policy in this case as well, regardless of whether we believe it will ever be accepted to mainline? > > Andrew. >
