On Feb 21, 2006, at 4:44 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
Is this the intended layout of this structure? What does it mean when a field runs off the end of the structure? In this case, should I just ignore the type size and assume that the 8 bytes are dynamically there?
I wonder if this is the same problem as recorded as PR 22488. To me it does sound
like the same issue. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
