On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:44:37AM -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:36:13AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote: > | > MRS and Eric Botcazou objected strongly against not being able to > | > build a 1-stage GCC with --disable-bootstrap. And that's never going > | > to happen. > | > > | > One would hope that wouldn't, but what I heard was an objection > | > against removing what's there now, namely the capability to bootstrap > | > GCC and *just* GCC. In other words, to have a mode when you can do a > | > bootstrap that does no more work than the present one does. > | > | I don't believe anyone has said that except for you. > > Indeed. And I would not count repeated mails from Richard Kenner as > *lot of people*, no matter how many times he sent the message :-)
Given that each mail from Richard starts a new thread, sometimes it looks that way. Richard, *please* use a proper mail program. Any thread you participate in is painful to follow.
