On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:23:47PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote: > gcc_assert (IS_EXPR_CODE_CLASS (kind) > && TREE_CODE_LENGTH (code) == 2 > && op0 != NULL_TREE > && op1 != NULL_TREE); > > I am having problems with this because it's causing failures for perfectly > valid IL. With the new OpenMP IL, we have statements that have optional > operands. In particular, things like > > DEFTREECODE (OMP_SINGLE, "omp_single", tcc_statement, 2)
Why would we be trying to fold OMP_SINGLE? r~
