Peter S. Mazinger wrote:

> --- gcc-4.0.2/gcc/config/m68k/linux.h.mps     2006-01-08 23:02:06 +0100
> +++ gcc-4.0.2/gcc/config/m68k/linux.h 2006-01-08 23:03:02 +0100
> @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@
>       LINUX_TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS();         \
>       builtin_define_std ("mc68000");         \
>       builtin_define_std ("mc68020");         \
> +     if (flag_pic)                           \
> +       {                                     \
> +         builtin_define ("__PIC__");         \
> +         builtin_define ("__pic__");         \
> +       }                                     \

This shouldn't be needed on HEAD because c-cppbuiltin.c
already defines them globally for all targets.

In gcc-4_0-branch and gcc-4_1-branch, __PIC__ and __pic__ are
already defined appropriately for all subtargets by the
TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS macro in m68k.h.


> @@ -98,10 +103,10 @@
>  #undef CPP_SPEC
>  #if TARGET_DEFAULT & MASK_68881
>  #define CPP_SPEC \
> -  "%{fPIC|fpic|fPIE|fpie:-D__PIC__ -D__pic__} 
> %{!msoft-float:-D__HAVE_68881__} %{posix:-D_POSIX_SOURCE} 
> %{pthread:-D_REENTRANT}"
> +  "%{!msoft-float:-D__HAVE_68881__} %{posix:-D_POSIX_SOURCE} 
> %{pthread:-D_REENTRANT}"
>  #else
>  #define CPP_SPEC \
> -  "%{fPIC|fpic|fPIE|fpie:-D__PIC__ -D__pic__} %{m68881:-D__HAVE_68881__} 
> %{posix:-D_POSIX_SOURCE} %{pthread:-D_REENTRANT}"
> +  "%{m68881:-D__HAVE_68881__} %{posix:-D_POSIX_SOURCE} 
> %{pthread:-D_REENTRANT}"
>  #endif

Dropping these from 4.0/4.1 should be harmless because
they are clearly redundant, but it's not a regression
so I'd not bother.

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/


Reply via email to