> From: Michael Veksler wrote: > I am not sure if the original poster meant the same as I do. What I have > in mind is optimizations opportunities like the one of the following > linked list:
(for reference: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-01/msg00007.html ) - although not specifically what I was concerned about, it certainly seems reasonable as a non-portable target specific definition that may correspondingly be utilized as a basis of a target specific behavior preserving optimization.
