Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Paul Schlie wrote: | | >- Are there any particular formally "undefined" language semantics you | > perceive as being difficult associate with an alternatively well defined | > target specific implementation behavior? As if not, I can only interpret | > your response as being itself both seemingly unfounded and meaningless. | > | > | > | IN every case where the standard specifies undefined behavior, it has | a very good reason for doing so.
Maybe that is the case for Ada; for the C or C++ standards, you'll have to define "good reason". -- Gaby
