> > On Nov 28, 2005, at 10:55 AM, Richard Kenner wrote: > > It's not that simple and I suspect you know it. > > Yes, this is all fine and very well, but do you realize that Andrew > wanted to break gcc behavior as mandated by the ISO standard? This > is very, very simple. The answer is no. I'm not budging on this, > really.
I was, there was no where in I was saying we should break ISO standard but I was saying that GNU C needs to better defined and if in that point, making it clearer that GNU C is superset of ISO C, that is the best way of doing it. Making what volatile means to GNU C clearer is no different than making saying in the documention what volatile means to the ISO C standard. -- Pinski
