On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Osku Salerma wrote: > Not sure what you mean by "have the branches locally" (SVK?), but a > plain rename of a branch doesn't force new check-outs, people can use > svn switch to point their working copies at the new branch name.
As far as I can experienced, svn switch does have a major drawback: you'll get all those subtrees that you had "disabled" using the svn switch svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/emptydir subdirname trick. Dan, is there a way to avoid that? Gerald
