Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | > | of what the semantics of REFERENCE_TYPE are/should be, then yes. | > | > | > | > See, it is not a semantics I made up. Even people arguing for null | > | > reference recognize it is undefined behaviour. | > | | > | With C++ yes but not with Fortran where there are optional arguments. | > | > Then what is the difference between a pointer type and a reference type? | | To the middle-end nothing,
That is why GCC got it wrong. [...] | GCC is not a C++ play ground. ? -- Gaby
