Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Middle-End > ---------- > 23109 > 23948
These are the same patch, and it's too complicated for me.
> 24365
Looks plausible but I don't understand the code well enough.
> 24483
Approved.
> 24589
Approved.
> 23155
Approved.
> 24408
The followup to the patch suggests that it is inappropriate:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01656.html
Ian
