Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. Apple tags should go in a subdirectory named "apple". > > (Whether you guys want to further subdivide your taggings, is your > business) > > Not to single apple out, i imagine anyone who wants to do daily or > significant amounts of tagging should have their own subdir.
And, not to omit the obvious, Apple should reconsider whether they need to do a daily tag at all. The daily tag was clearly useful for CVS. For SVN it should suffice to write down a single revision number. Is there any reason to continue the daily tag? > 2. All the old old-gcc tags should go in a subdirectory named "old-gcc". > > Whether we want to further subdivide them, no idea (IE there's a bunch > of libc tags, etc). I would vote for simply ditching the old-gcc libc, gcc-2_8_1, make, gnumach, and hurd tags. If I had thought about it, I would have had the gccmerge process discard them. Ian
