On Oct 25, 2005, at 12:50 AM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Uhm, I'm not sure how to explain this without being too pedantic.
Does this
sound clearer?
This tool tracks each individual change (fine-grained) and will never
reapply an already applied change.
I think that is a high level answer, and completely answers the
question to people that have the question, while doing as little as
possible to confuse someone that doesn't even have the question.
Anyone doing merges should have the question and understand the answer.
Or, you can say it merges in N-1 to N, when one requests a merge of
N. A totally different way of expressing the same thing, and conveys
the same information.
Sound reasonable?
