> > I'm talking about the *definition*, not philosphical issues. > > > > Does the proposed *definition* only refer to LLMs? > > ehm... yes? > > That's the topic of this thread, after all.
Sorry, I lost context.
> > I'm talking about the *definition*, not philosphical issues. > > > > Does the proposed *definition* only refer to LLMs? > > ehm... yes? > > That's the topic of this thread, after all.
Sorry, I lost context.