On Oct 13, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Thomas Costa wrote:
So can the existing set of warnings that -Weffc++ enables be broken
up into fine grained warnings quite easily?
Yes. M-x grep warn_ecpp in gcc/cp/*, then replace:
warning (0,
with
warning (OPT_Weffc_12,
and then arrange for an -Weffc_12 flag (or whatever name you like).
If his new book removes one you don't like, just whack it instead.
We can default ones that go against sane C++ to off, that way, we can
restore the utility of the -Weffc++ flag.
Has it already been done?
No.
Sound good?
