Am Samstag, dem 09.11.2024 um 00:54 +0100 schrieb Alejandro Colomar via Gcc:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> I'm in the process of rebasing my __countof__ changes after your patch
> that fixes support for [*] and [0].
> 
> I should update the implementation of the following function:
> 
>       static bool
>       is_top_array_vla (tree type)
>       {
>         bool zero, star, var;
>         tree d;
> 
>         if (TREE_CODE (type) != ARRAY_TYPE)
>           return false;
>         if (!COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))
>           return false;
> 
>         d = TYPE_DOMAIN (type);
>         zero = !TYPE_MAX_VALUE (d);
>         star = (zero && C_TYPE_VARIABLE_SIZE (type));
>         if (star)
>           return true;
>         if (zero)
>           return false;
> 
>         var = (TREE_CODE (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (d)) != INTEGER_CST
>               || TREE_CODE (TYPE_MAX_VALUE (d)) != INTEGER_CST);
>         return var;
>       }
> 
> The 'star' calculation should be updated.  Would you mind proposing an
> implementation of this function that works with your changes?  Thanks!
> 
You can just eliminate the code for the star as it would now
automatically end up as variable.

Martin




Reply via email to