Hi,
On Thu, Jan 11 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/11/24 12:48, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 10 2024, Jason Merrill via Gcc wrote:
>>> What formatting style do we want for non-trivial lambdas in GCC sources?
>>> I'm thinking the most consistent choice would be
>>>
>>> auto l = [&] (parms) // space between ] (
>>> { // brace on new line, indented two spaces
>>> return stuff;
>>> };
>>>
>>> By default, recent emacs lines up the { with the previous line, like an
>>> in-class function definition; I talked it into the above indentation with
>>>
>>> (defun lambda-offset (elem)
>>> (if (assq 'inline-open c-syntactic-context) '+ 0))
>>> (add-to-hook 'c++-mode-hook '(c-set-offset 'inlambda 'lambda-offset))
>>
>> Is this really add-to-hook and not add-hook?
>
> Oops! add-to-hook is a custom variant I wrote back in like 1992; for
> add-hook you'll want
>
> (add-hook 'c++-mode-hook
> '(lambda () (c-set-offset 'inlambda 'lambda-offset)))
>
I see, thanks!
Martin
