Hi all,

I can see about 500 failing tests on the
vendors/riscv/gcc-13-with-riscv-opts, a mostly-full list at the bottom
of this email. It's mostly test cases scraping for vector
instructions.

However, these tests all pass on master. Presumably the vendor branch
failures can all be fixed by cherry picking the right patches from
master, but figuring out which ones is probably going to be a slog, so
I wanted to ask if there's any desire/point in doing so? Would it be
better to just wait until these are automagically fixed by a future
rebase?

BR,
Maxim

---

Unique files that trigger failures in vendor branch, but not in master:

gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_unary-1.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_unary-2.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_unary-3.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_unary-4.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_unary-5.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_unary-6.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_unary-7.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_unary-8.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/strided_load-2.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr111751.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/slp-mask-1.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_load-1.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_load-2.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_load-3.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_load-4.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_load-5.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_load-6.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_load-7.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_store-1.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_store-2.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_store-3.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_store-4.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_store-5.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_store-6.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_store-7.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-10.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-11.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-12.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-13.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-14.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-15.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-16.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-17.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-18.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-1.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-2.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-3.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-4.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-5.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-6.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-7.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-8.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-9.c
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/cond_not-1.c

Reply via email to