* Eli Zaretskii via Gcc: >> Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 21:07:07 +0200 >> From: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> >> Cc: Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected] >> >> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 10:04:06PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii via Gcc wrote: >> > People who ignore warnings will use options that disable these new >> > errors, exactly as they disable warnings. So we will end up not >> >> Some subset of them will surely do that. But I think most people will just >> fix the code when they see hard errors, rather than trying to work around >> them. > > The same logic should work for warnings. That's why we have warnings, > no?
People completely miss the warning and go to great lengths to show that what they are dealing is a compiler bug. (I tried to elaborate on that in <[email protected]>.) If GCC errors out, that simply does not happen because there is no object code to examine. Thanks, Florian
