On 2/20/23 06:54, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:56 AM Vincent Fazio via Gcc <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Michael, all, Regarding: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766 <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102110 <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102110> If I understand correctly, since the GCC MicroBlaze targets generate ELF images, it would seem there's no technical reason why `__attribute__ ((symver ...))` cannot be supported? The issue seems to be that the MicroBlaze targets in config.gcc do not include elfos.h https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config.gcc#L2369 <https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config.gcc#L2369> Which defines `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE` https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/elfos.h#L259 <https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/elfos.h#L259> Which is necessary for https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/varasm.cc#L6260 <https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/varasm.cc#L6260> Changing the targets to include elfos.h leads to a number of conflicts with the target specific header (config/microblaze/microblaze.h). Should `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE` be copied into config/microblaze/microblaze.h or should the MicroBlaze targets and header be reworked to support elfos.h? IMO reworked to include elfos.h. During the RTEMS port, we noticed thatsome quirks on the microblaze gcc because it isn't using elfos.h. This likelywill mean it will be updated as a side-effect of normal GCC maintenance instead of being an odd singleton which doesn't share. I'm asking because I've seen a number of projects run into this issue (xz, elfutils, libfuse, libkcapi, cryptsetup). And RTEMS. --joel
Joel -- do you have a patch to add elfos.h to MicroBlaze? -- Michael Eager
