Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I suggest you to double check also the list present in this mail: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01625.html >> >> This was never publically approved, but it reflects views of many GCC >> maintainers. Surely it does not hurt to follow those guidelines, even if >> they are (yet) not showstoppers for a backend inclusion. > > I see that I reviewed it with two days back then. Not everything I > could/can approve as web pages maintainer (because it looks like > policy changes), but I see that about half of the changes I only > had minor editorial comments on. > > Would you mind taking and committing those?
Well, I believe the gist of the review was that I needed to get agreements from GWP or similar about the policy. I also later got a confirmation from the SC that I don't need their explicit approval on technical issues. I'd rather have a GWP approval on the technical contents before committing those changes. -- Giovanni Bajo
