On Tuesday 06 September 2005 14:04, Richard Kenner wrote: > On the > other hand, we define "valid GENERIC" to be those trees that were generated > by the compiler immediately before the tree-ssa conversion and trees of the > above form were generated then. So they are valid GENERIC and ought to be > handled by the gimplifier.
I don't think we ever defined "valid GENERIC" that way. If we had done that, the C and C++ front ends wouldn't have had to be converted to make them produce valid GENERIC. So IMHO your code should just be Ada specific. Gr. Steven
