I filed a bug #23660:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23660
Regards,
Vahur
Richard Guenther wrote:
On 8/31/05, Vahur Sinijärv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote> Hi,
No, the problem I wrote about is not fixed. I used GCC from CVS head
30.08.2005.
I think you found a different bug, you seem to have many unneccessary
uses of secondary memory between moves from MMX reg to MMX reg. The code
I wrote about (in i386.c) allows direct moves between MMX regs, but
prevents moves directly from general registers to MMX registers, so this
cannot be the case.
Please provide a testcase and report a bug with the
gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla interface.
Thanks,
Richard.
