On 08/24/05 13:40, Richard Henderson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:22:09PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:

Alternatively, i can just add the "no resort" interface.
(or of course, write the ugly code to keep rechecking which operands got
switched after each call to update_stmt :P)


I'd prefer we kill it.

That'd be my preference as well.

Reply via email to