> I'm not going to be able to remember exactly. It might be worth > looking at various proprietary Unixes to see if they've got > fprintf_unlocked, but given the date I don't think I was looking at > one of them. My best guess is that I simply assumed glibc had it, > since it seemed to have _unlocked variants of all the other stdio > functions. > zw
Hmm, I found another interesting reference to fprintf_unlocked here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg00805.html In it Dave points out that hpux is missing fputc_unlocked and therefore neither fputs_unlocked or fprintf_unlocked should transform into fputc_unlocked. Dave, does hpux have fprintf_unlocked or was mentioning it a mistake? Thanks, --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
