Wu Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am reading <<gcc internal>> and found two typoes.  Here is a patch to
> fix them.

Thanks!  I've applied it under the obviously-correct rule after testing
with "make dvi" and "make info".

> Is this the correct mail-list for this kind of patch.  Thanks.

Not quite: there's a separate gcc-patches list for patch submissions.
For future reference, patch submissions should also include a changelog
for the patch (even if it's really trivial ;).  These changelogs should
be separate from the patch itself; they shouldn't be patches against the
ChangeLog files.

For example, I used:

2005-08-11  Wu Zhou  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        * doc/rtl.texi: Fix two typos.

for your patch.

Richard

Reply via email to