Wu Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am reading <<gcc internal>> and found two typoes. Here is a patch to > fix them.
Thanks! I've applied it under the obviously-correct rule after testing with "make dvi" and "make info". > Is this the correct mail-list for this kind of patch. Thanks. Not quite: there's a separate gcc-patches list for patch submissions. For future reference, patch submissions should also include a changelog for the patch (even if it's really trivial ;). These changelogs should be separate from the patch itself; they shouldn't be patches against the ChangeLog files. For example, I used: 2005-08-11 Wu Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * doc/rtl.texi: Fix two typos. for your patch. Richard