On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:29:49PM -0700, Geoffrey Keating wrote: > I agree with both comments here: it's lame that we have duplicated > documentation (and explains why I didn't realise that I had to change > two places), and I don't think that we should be considering specs to > be an user-level interface to GCC. > > So, what do people think about (a) deleting the big comment in gcc.c > that tries to explain specs (leaving a pointer to the manual), and (b) > moving the specs documentation to the internals manual?
I think it's a good idea - but someone should compare the two existing bits of documentation first, since IIRC I've seen people add to one but not the other. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
