On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 18:55 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Thursday 30 June 2005 18:05, fjahanian wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2005, at 2:50 PM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote: > > > On Jun 27, 2005, at 12:56 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > > >> Hmm. I would suspect this is obsolete now. We'll have forced > > >> everything into "registers" (or something equivalent that we > > >> can work with) during tree optimization. Any CSEs that can be > > >> made should have been made. > > (...) > > > 2005-06-30 Fariborz Jahanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > * opts.c (decode_options): Don't set -fforce-mem with -O2 and more. > > If the code is obsolete as rth suggested, wouldn't it be even better to > remover all traces of it, i.e. clean up all places where flag_force_mem > is checked? I'd tend to agree. I'd rather see the option go away than linger on if the option is no longer useful.
Jeff
