Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics?

[Michael Veksler]

Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/06/2005 15:30:27:

> On Tuesday 28 June 2005 14:16, Paul Koning wrote:
> >
> > I must be missing something.
>
> Yes.
>
> > Unsigned has wraparound (modulo)
> > semantics.
>
> The whole point is that it doesn't.
>

I think that you confuse between signed and unsigned.
Signed does not have modulo semantics (in GCC.
The standard permits it to have modulo semantics).

  Michael