On Sunday 19 June 2005 03:03, you wrote: > Tommy Vercetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Sunday 19 June 2005 00:32, you wrote: > | > Something like: > | > > | > http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~gregod/STLlint/STLlint.html > | > | Yeah, but for more than just STL, and opensource. C++ checker that > | is going to work for instance for KDE. > | Wonder why they use proprietary parser, > > maybe because they work? ;-p
> | there are opensource > | parsers around, like elsa, or gcc c++ parser. > > Elsa does not parse C++. Elsa is for C/C++, so it says on their website. > GCC/g++ parser is tightly integrated to GCC. > > Most of the tools I know of are either "research projects" (which > means that they basically "die" when the professor get promoted or the > students graduate; they are lots of them out there) or are/ use > proprietary tools. > > We need to get GCC/g++ to a competing level of usefulness but the road > is not quite that straight. Yep. Btw, don't have to cc me, I'm reading that list. -- Vercetti
