On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:27:55AM -0400, Paul Schlie wrote:

> Upon a potential integer overflow of either it's min or max range,
> shouldn't the result be set to [min:type-min-value, max:type-max-value],
> without the necessity of any further designations?
> 
If you want this behaviour, use -fwrapv.


Diego.

Reply via email to