Opinions on how to handle this bug? http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21250
a) don't print the <built-in> line; or b) output its line number as 1; or c) fix its line number (internally) as 1.
c) seems cleanest to me, but I don't really care.
This is especially an issue for people who use cpp to preprocessor assembler, which of course we don't really support.
Strangely enough it is in the documentation, though (see invoke.texi).
Objections to this approach? Other suggestions? One alternative is to fix gas to not complain about line number 0.
No complaints. But note that gas is *right* with complaining about it.
Segher
