> I'm not confident we know what clean results are for all the primary > platforms, i.e. that anyone has tracked what failures are regressions and > what aren't (which requires testing the FAILing tests with older > compilers, not just presuming that a FAILing test not in a previous > release isn't a regression).
I don't think we need to be that picky at this stage of the development process. Results on 05/15 for SPARC/Solaris are pretty good: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg01061.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg01060.html and can be considered as a baseline for now. -- Eric Botcazou
