On May 17, 2005 12:21 PM, Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:16 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > On May 17, 2005 11:29 AM, Richard Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 01:59, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > > > > > No, I just don't build gfortran as a cross. There are many reasons > > > > why this is a bad idea anyway. > > > > > > Such as? > > > > For one thing, libgfortran requires c99 support, which is not in > > newlib iiuc. > > More details please. > > Are you referring to stdint.h/inttypes.h etc.? > newlib/RTEMS has them, as well as newlib+cygwin
Some other newlib (and non-newlib) targets don't, see PR14325 and PR16135. There was also some issue with c99 math functions that I have not followed closely. Some fixes for this went in for HP-UX and Solaris. I don't know if newlib always provides all the math functions libgfortran asks for. Note that I did not mean to imply that gfortran should not be buildable as a cross, just that I know that there used to be some problems with this. Gr. Steven
