On Tuesday 17 May 2005 02:59, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Tuesday 17 May 2005 02:53, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 00:10 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > On Monday 16 May 2005 23:43, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 10:42 -0400, Peter Barada wrote: > > > > > Until package maintainers take cross-compilation *seriously*, I > > > > > have no choice but to do native compilation of a large hunk of the > > > > > packages on eval boards that can literally takes *DAYS* to build. > > > > > > > > The most amazing fact to me is: Not even GCC seems to take cross- > > > > compilation seriously :( > > > > > > BS. Even the large disto builders do cross compilations a lot. > > > > So I suppose you have these general crossbuilding PRs fixed in your > > sources: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21143 > > No, I just don't build gfortran as a cross. There are many reasons > why this is a bad idea anyway. > > Oh, and how helpful of you to post that patch to gcc-patches@ too... > NOT!
Ah, I see you did post it to gcc-patches@, but not to fortran@, which is a requirement for gfortran patches -- and the reason why nobody has noticed the patch. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg02287.html The patch is OK too. Gr. Steven
