Greg Schafer wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:44:59PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > > GCC 3.4.4 RC2 is now available here: > > > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-3.4.4-20050512 > > > > There are just a few changes from RC1 to fix critical problems people > > experienced with RC1. > > > > Please download, build, and test. > > Done.
Likewise, s390(x)-ibm-linux are working fine now: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg00916.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg00917.html > Something went wrong with the libstdc++ testsuite. It doesn't show up in the > test results: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg00856.html > > AFAICT, the libstdc++ testsuite _did_ run, but it doesn't show up. This > could be pilot error on my behalf, but I've followed the exact same scripted > procedure for ages so I don't think so. > > Oops, I failed to realise it also happened with RC1: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg00670.html Um? This does have the libstd++ results ... > I've run out of time right now and cannot investigate it immediately. Anyone > else seeing this? Quick browse of other test results suggests I'm not alone. > Maybe there's a BZ already? Dunno. It would appear the problem is this patch: 2005-05-12 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-04-04 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * testsuite/Makefile.am (check-local): Remove. (curent_symbols.txt): Likewise. (check-abi): Do not depend on current_symbols.txt. * testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerated. * testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp: Build current_symbols.txt. 2005-04-01 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * testsuite/Makefile.am (noinst_PROGRAMS): Remove. (site.exp): Write out the path to the baseline file. (check-abi): Use DejaGNU. (check-abi-verbose): Remove. * testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerated. * testsuite/abi_check.cc (main): Check the return value from compare_symbols. * testsuite/testsuite_abi.cc (compare_symbols): Return a value. * testsuite/testsuite_abi.h (compare_symbols): Adjust prototype. * testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp: New file. 2004-03-19 Phil Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * testsuite/Makefile.am (site.exp): New target, based on that created by automake. Also set libiconv. While using DejaGNU for check-abi might be a good idea in principle, the way it is currently set up means that the 'make check-abi' run will overwrite the libstdc++.log and libstdc++.sum files generated by the main 'make check' run. This is why the results are missing from the test_summary report ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand Linux on zSeries Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
