----Original Message----
>From: Zack Weinberg
>Sent: 09 May 2005 19:38
> Bernard Leak writes:
>> Can something be done to make the problem less obstructive?
>> It's not obvious that the script should try to be too clever and
>> work out which name to use. Mail looks as useful as any name
>> it can have hard-coded. However, a comment could be added
>> to the script *output*
> [... more useful suggestions ...]
>
> This is where I quietly mention that patches are welcome.
>
> zw
How about an option to format the output suitable for piping straight into
"telnet mail.gnu.org 25"?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
