Joe Buck writes:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 07:40:37PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Koning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Paul> Maybe. Then again, maybe there are real problems here. The ranlib
> > Paul> one was already mentioned. And I wonder if libjava really needs to
> > Paul> bring the host to its knees, as it does.
> >
> > Killing machines is only a secondary goal, if that's what you mean ;-)
> >
> > The bad news is that libjava is only going to grow.
> >
> > On the other hand, while I haven't measured it myself, I've heard that
> > a lot of the time in the libjava build is spent in libtool (versus
> > plain old ld). Perhaps that can be alleviated somehow.
>
> Has anyone looked at oprofile data for the libjava build?
Again:
CPU: CPU with timer interrupt, speed 0 MHz (estimated)
Profiling through timer interrupt
TIMER:0|
samples| %|
------------------
1770547 63.0596 no-vmlinux
415708 14.8058 libc-2.3.4.so
259889 9.2562 ltsh
257355 9.1659 jc1
22111 0.7875 cc1plus
20260 0.7216 as
19289 0.6870 ld-2.3.4.so
10502 0.3740 make
5921 0.2109 sed
5163 0.1839 libbfd-2.15.92.0.2.so
2855 0.1017 gcj
2724 0.0970 cc1
2218 0.0790 libz.so.1.2.1.2
2154 0.0767 grep
2019 0.0719 xterm
1864 0.0664 ld
Andrew.
