On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:59:18AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Hi, > > Please forgive this remark - especially if it has been discussed before (I > don't follow this list.) > > I think that Mark's key (0xB75C61B8) might not have been the best choice to > sign the gcc release because it lacks connections to the majority of the > OpenPGP web of trust, being signed only by one other key afaict.
Mark is the person making the release, therefore it is his word that it is a valid release and no one else's. If you'd feel better about a key with more signatures, then maybe Mark can arrange to have people sign his key at the GCC Summit.
