On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:36:59AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:10:39AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > >> > >>So it seems adding coldfire-linux is the only way > >>to address this... > > > > Why? Adding support (if it isn't already there) for something like > > --with-arch=coldfire should work just as well. > > But how do we change behavior in gcc/config/t-linux > according to the switch?
You probably don't need to. The newly built compiler will default to the right architecture; any assembly routines can be keyed off an appropriate builtin define. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
