Daniel Berlin wrote: > >IE if we added a very large warning to the submission page that said > >"PLEASE NOTE: BY SUBMITTING A TESTCASE, YOU AGREE THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT > >TO CREATE, USE, AND PUBLISH EITHER YOUR VERBATIM TESTCASE OR A > >DERIVATIVE UNDER GCC'S CURRENT LICENSE" > >or something of the sort, they would be very hard pressed to win in a > >real lawsuit in court.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 05:21:02PM -0500, Robert Dewar wrote: > I think that would be a goof ides, I would say GPL explicitlty, since > several different licenses are used in GCC. Freudian slip? It seems that this may well be a "goof idea". Then we can't accept any test cases from free software that has a GPL-incompatible license. Our only requirement for a testcase is that it can be distributed with gcc, and that modified forms can also be distributed. It is a mistake to try to be more strict, or to specify either "GPL" or "GCC's CURRENT LICENSE".
