On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:25:00 -0500, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 14:27 -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Christian Joensson wrote: > > > Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) > > > sun4u: > > > > > I get these failures and just would like to ping for any ideas what > > > might be wrong... > > > > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g assembly comparison > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 assembly comparison > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O1 assembly comparison > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O0 -g assembly comparison > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O0 assembly comparison > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O1 assembly comparison > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O0 -g assembly comparison > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O0 assembly comparison > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O1 assembly comparison > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-03/msg00025.html > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-03/msg00127.html > > > > > > Doubtful it's directly related. > He's getting miscompares without -g, and his compiler is newer than my > patch. If it was really the same problem, > 1. it would have either gone away or showed up with each patch > 2. it would have only affected -g > 3. it would have affected gcc.dg/pch/save-temps.c >
This is now http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20673 -- Cheers, /ChJ
