[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > | > Do you demonstrate that "C++ is not LALR(1)"? > | > | I'll leave that to you as a homework assignment. Actually, C++ is not > | LALR(N) for any N.
Nor is it LR(N) nor LL(N). > | Get out the C++ grammar and figure it out, it's an easy proof. > | Come back when you have proved it to your own satisfaction, and > | please refrain from giving advice in the meantime. > > It's not an easy proof. You are mistaken. The proof is trivial for C++. zw
