Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well, that sounds largely impossible. Can you point exactly which bug >> are >> you talking of? I know for a fact that the extension itself has always >> worked for basic rvalue usage, with basic types. Instead, I would not >> be >> surprised if some more complex usage of it used to be (or still is) >> broken, >> like weird lvalue contexts, usage in templates, operator overloading or >> similar. > > Yes this was PR 19068 and bug 18548.
Thanks. Nonetheless, both are regressions, and both shows a rather complex situation which includes pointer tricks. My statement that basic usage of the extension has always worked still holds. -- Giovanni Bajo
