Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi everyone,
why the result is (0,0) instead of (1,0)?!?
Actually, sorry, __builtin_cpow returns (nan, nan) (got sidetracked by a
strange issue I'm seeing in the C++ library), even "worse", so to speak...
Paolo.
- __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Andrew Haley
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Duncan Sands
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,... Chris Jefferson
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,... Duncan Sands
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,... Marcin Dalecki
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,... Marcin Dalecki
- Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,... Robert Dewar