Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> struct cgraph_edge is currently member of two lists, i.e.
> it contains two "next" pointers, but is annotated like
>
> struct cgraph_edge GTY((chain_next ("%h.next_caller")))
> {
> struct cgraph_node *caller;
> struct cgraph_node *callee;
> struct cgraph_edge *next_caller;
> struct cgraph_edge *next_callee;
> tree call_expr;
> PTR GTY ((skip (""))) aux;
> /* When NULL, inline this call. When non-NULL, points to the
> explanation
> why function was not inlined. */
> const char *inline_failed;
> };
>
> Is it possible and beneficial to have both next pointers
> annotated with chain_next?
No, it's not possible. I doubt it's beneficial, either.
