* Daniel Berlin: > It's not easier to implement. Trying to translate cvs into changesets > is not easy (though the reverse is), unless you do it the stupid way (IE > not try to discover what is a copy and what isn't). > So matching commit for commit won't give you good history. > Especially on branches.
The CVS loginfo script is invoked with a list of files changed in that commit. (I don't think that conversion should be done this way, but it's still an option.)
