Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steven Bosscher wrote: > > Or should the development plan beupdated to reflect your new way of > > working (ie. the projects info collecting thing) and the actual > > development schedule that we seem to be working on. > > It would probably be good if the development document was updated to > reflect the new procedure -- after we're sure we like it. I'm a > little hesitant to take the 4.0 experiment and judge it "the Right > Way" at this point. Let's see how 4.1 goes.
If you still think that the current development document describes "the Right Way", then we should be following it. If not, then could we have a document saying what we *are* following? Otherwise, it's really just whatever your whim is, and that goes against the spirit (and the mission statement) of the GCC project.
