From: Pierre-Emmanuel Patry <pierre-emmanuel.pa...@embecosm.com>

We might have some duplicated name in some pattern and we should
therefore not assert the non duplication of identifiers.

gcc/rust/ChangeLog:

        * resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc (Late::visit): Remove
        assertion and explicitely tells why we ignore the insertion result.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Emmanuel Patry <pierre-emmanuel.pa...@embecosm.com>
---
 gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc 
b/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc
index fa759d7bc8b..df67b4f9873 100644
--- a/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc
+++ b/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc
@@ -152,10 +152,10 @@ Late::visit (AST::IdentifierPattern &identifier)
   // do we insert in labels or in values
   // but values does not allow shadowing... since functions cannot shadow
   // do we insert functions in labels as well?
-  auto ok
-    = ctx.values.insert (identifier.get_ident (), identifier.get_node_id ());
 
-  rust_assert (ok);
+  // We do want to ignore duplicated data because some situations rely on it.
+  std::ignore
+    = ctx.values.insert (identifier.get_ident (), identifier.get_node_id ());
 }
 
 void
-- 
2.45.2

Reply via email to